Let X, Y be random variables distributed as N(0, 1) and let Cov(X, Y) = p. Calculate E[X2Y2].
I have that Cov(X, Y) = E[(X - 0)(Y - 0)] = E[XY] = p.
I have no idea how to continue on however. I can't think of a way to relate E[X2Y2] with E[XY]. I have considered the Var(XY) but that also...
Amer, could you explain a little more why $s_n - t_n$ must be non decreasing for n > r?
I don't really see how that follows from knowing $|s_n(x) - f(x)| < \epsilon$ and $|t_n(x) - f(x)| < \epsilon$. These expressions tell us how to bound $s_n - t_n$ for each n, but doesn't seem to give us a...
I know there are many proofs for this but I am having trouble proving this fact using my book's definition.
My book defines first a non negative measurable function f as a function that can be written as the limit of a non decreasing sequence of non-negative simple functions.
Then my book...
Let R be a UFD and K be its field of fractions. Let f(x) be in R[x] and f(x) = a(x)b(x) where a(x), b(x) are in K[x]. Show that there exists a c in K such that c*a(x) and c-1*b(x) are both in R[x] and such that f(x) = (c*a(x))(c-1*b(x)) in R[x].
I have been stuck on this for a while now as I...
ah yes I should have mentioned that my definition of rings include 1.
thank you for your answer!
i was having trouble showing that the "reverse" of the map i originally suggested was onto but now i understand.
Let R be a commutative ring and I, J be ideals of R. Show that (I + J)/J is isomorphic to I(R/J) as R modules.
I am having trouble coming up with the explicit isomorphism. For I(R/J) I know any element can be expressed as i(r + J) = ir + J by definition of the action of R on R/J.
As for (I +...
ah i see. now forgetting about the group of rationals, if we just let G be the direct product of countably many copies of Z, we would also have G isomorphic to G x G right? it seems like it would be the same argument as in the case for a direct sum.
i wouldn't have thought of taking the direct sum of infinitely many copies of Z. seems like an interesting example.
would the result also be true if we took an infinite direct product instead of direct sum?
thanks for your reply!
Let G be the group of positive rational numbers under multiplication. Show G is isomorphic to G x G.
i'm not sure how to start this. i am trying to come up with an explicit isomorphim but i can't seem to find one.
can someone give me some hints on how to approach this?
In a proof showing that the vector space of all functions from a metric space X to the complex numbers C is complete under the supremum norm, there was a line near the end that i was confused about.
starting here:
\(sup|f - fn| \leq liminf_{m \to +\infty} ||f_n - f_m|| \)
the next step then is...
I have the ideal I = <f1, f2, f3>, where f1 = x0x2-x12, f2 = x0x3 - x2x1, f3 = x1x3 - x22.
I also have the parametrization of some surface given by \phi: \mathbb{C}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{C}^4 defined by \phi(s, t) = (s^3, s^2t, st^2, t^3) = (x_0, x_1, x_2, x_3) .
I want to show that V(I) =...
let f = x2 + 2y2 and x = rcos(\theta), y = rsin(\theta) .
i have \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} (while holding x constant) = 4y . and \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} (while holding r constant) = 2y .
i found these partial derivatives by expressing f in terms of only x and y, and then in...
thanks for the counterexample! that helped me see what could happen if that condition wasn't met.
i'm still trying to figure out what went wrong in my argument though. By using Zorn's Lemma, i was able to find an element a in I that divides every element in I so it follows that I is contained...
after thinking about it some more, it seems to me that condition #1 follows from condition #2 by taking the ideal I = (a, b) generated by 2 elements a and b. Then from the argument above using condition #2 and Zorn's Lemma, we have I = (a, b) = (c) for some element c that divides all elements of...