Recent content by njh

  1. N

    Henderson Hasselbalch Equation - Request for Clarification

    Thank you again for the clarification. For what should have been a simple concept, I feel that I made a three course meal of it; for which I appreciate people's effort.
  2. N

    Henderson Hasselbalch Equation - Request for Clarification

    Thank you again. I was confusing the concepts of Protonation and Dissociation. I have looked again at protonation with reference to titration of an amino acid. I understand that "Protonation" refers to the extent that a molecule has an [H+] available to donate. In the case of COOH ↔ COO-...
  3. N

    Henderson Hasselbalch Equation - Request for Clarification

    Thank you, I understand now. Once an acid has reached equilibrium in a solution, it can not donate more Hydrogen ions, even if the concentration of the acid is increased. This is because there is nothing to accept these Hydrogen ions. As a result, the concentration of undissociated acid will...
  4. N

    Henderson Hasselbalch Equation - Request for Clarification

    Thank you for the question. At a lower pH, the original acid donates more Hydrogen ions (which I think is due to a difference in electronegativity). So the acid is the protonator.
  5. N

    Henderson Hasselbalch Equation - Request for Clarification

    I understand the HH equation as: ##pH = pKa + log\frac{[A^-]}{[HA]}## The Numerator of the fraction is the conjugate Base of the original acid. The denominator is the undissociated/ unprotonated Acid. I understand that when the pH equals the PkA, then the solution is 50% dissociated, so...
  6. N

    Limit to Infinity of Quotient with Square Root - Reducing the Equation

    Fantastic, so -2/3. There were a couple of things that I hit a wall on. The first was watching the negatives at each stage, which with hindsight just requires care. The second was that I initially tried to get rid of the square root as a way to simplify, which proved wrong. The one thing that...
  7. N

    Limit to Infinity of Quotient with Square Root - Reducing the Equation

    I think bamboum just meant in terms of whether the numerator or denominator dominates the equation, so they are just saying that the denominator dominates, which as a starting indicator sounds correct. Oh, but I think that I see what you mean. Whether it is + or - is not.
  8. N

    Limit to Infinity of Quotient with Square Root - Reducing the Equation

    Yes, that is the correct function. Thank you for the notation correction, as well as the reminder on addition and subtraction under square roots, which I see would have led me down the wrong path. I see the subsequent pointer from WWGD, so I'll try and answer that next and see where it takes me...
  9. N

    Limit to Infinity of Quotient with Square Root - Reducing the Equation

    ##\frac{\sqrt{16x^6}-\sqrt{x^2}}{6x^3 + x^2}## ##\frac{4x^3-\sqrt{x^2}}{6x^3+x^2}## ##\frac{4-\sqrt{x^2}}{6+x^2}## My request is may I confirm that I have this correct up to this point? I do know the final answer, I know the suggested process for calculating the answer, but I want to check...
  10. N

    B 1 divided by infinity equals zero (always?)

    Thank you (and incidentally, my apologies for not using mathematical notation in my question).
  11. N

    B 1 divided by infinity equals zero (always?)

    I understand the mathematics that 1 divided by infinity is virtually zero and so equals zero. I look on the internet and that is the answer that I get. Is this a simplification for early mathematics learning and, if I continue, will I find a more complex answer? The reason that I ask is that I...
  12. N

    Physics Physics vs financial stability

    There are many people studying subjects that they do not specialise in as a career, so an alternative way to think about it is how transferable are the skills. I would consider any quantitative subject such as physics would make most quantitative careers easier. This includes more heavily...
  13. N

    Probability using combinations or alternatives

    Thank you for that. So, my first mistake was in my original Combination calculation that I thought I had correct. I calculated 36/ 270,725 as equal to 0.133%, whereas it is 0.0133%. In trying to replicate the same wrong answer using probabilities I ignored logic and tried magic and brute force...
  14. N

    Probability using combinations or alternatives

    Thank you for that. It helped me realise that I made an error in my Combination calculation at the start and I have since been trying to magic a probability-derived answer that fit with this incorrect calculation. How very frustrating. I now see that 36/ 270,725 equals 0.013% and not 0.133%...
Back
Top