Recent content by link223

  1. link223

    Can you explain the correct way to choose axes for circular motion analysis?

    why is the left one not permitted? What I mean is that the normal force calculated doesn't come out correctly, tension dfor is correct however
  2. link223

    Can you explain the correct way to choose axes for circular motion analysis?

    Haii, I don't understand why I need to choose my n-t components in the direction of a circular motion and can't just use them with the n-axis along the rope and the binormal perpendicular to the surface.
  3. link223

    Oscillation with 2 springs attached to a mass

    How in the world I am supposed to start with this problem? No clue, so can't provide HW solution by any means. regards.
  4. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    sorry didn't see your comment when you posted it. ( I kind of said the same tjhing in the intial part.)oh okay that is interesting. So the problem gave it, but i wanted to see how I could've determined it on my own. But euh- why is that difference by factor of 4?
  5. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    no but that is what is not the case on this one, because the forces themselves are calculated by the constraint equation F = ##mu * N##. This means that I can get only two equations that useful from Newton's laws. And then I can either say that the rope is masseless such that the accelerations...
  6. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    By the way I did forget the normal force of A on B and of B on A in the analysis of equilibirum but is of no real consequence to the conclusion that 'd be drawn hand, at least I think ofc.
  7. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    That's why I say Newton's laws for the static situation and see in which dir. it would move when there was no friction and then just oppose that motion. So to say Mass A goes up, thus friction towards the left.
  8. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    even if I knew the friction forces, that doesn't tell me nothing, because there's no direction I can associate with them right?
  9. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    well no, but I determine now what the direction of motion would be such that I can say that the friction opposes the motioin, isn't that a good way to do this.?
  10. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    don't care about those right now? or do we? I mean they are let me calc real quick...
  11. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    Can I now think of this as to have A at rest, the rope needs to exert a 490.5N force, but at that point, mass B will already be moving such that it just goes upwards.
  12. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    sorry oki, equilibrium B with friction neglected. ##T_b = m_b*g/2 = 245.3N## Eq. A with friction neglected: ##T_a = m_a*g/2 = 49.05N## This is the place where there is actually no friction yet, just to correct miself.
  13. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    I did the analysis where they are in equilibrium then the tension force in A is way less than B, but how could this conclude that B goes down whilst A goes upP?
  14. link223

    Analyzing Mass A's Direction of Motion

    I am not very sure how I would be approach this. Obviously it is stated in which direction it's going where we see that mass A goes to the right, but how do I determine this stuff analytically.
  15. link223

    Friction Coefficients: Determining Force Direction?

    sure thing. for B ##F_b = 42.48n## for A ##F_a = 22.1n## and this concludes that it will push on B and not pull it gadaimm
Back
Top