Entropy reduction or quantum phenomena can occur microscopically, but entropy reduction is absolutely impossible by chance, and if a macroscopic object's wave function collapses due to measurement, does that mean that the macroscopic object will never be able to cause quantum phenomena? Even in...
In some ways, that's not too bad. Still, if I were rich in the future, didn't get old, and we solved the entropy problem, wouldn't it be something to think about?
In reality, there is no infinity, right? Isn't that moment finite, no matter how old it is? I think it is a paradox to make predictions by substituting infinity in reality.
Probability does not indicate the certainty of an event, so wouldn't an event with an extremely low probability never occur even in a universe with infinite time?
Infinity cannot exist in reality, right? Therefore, I do not believe that the infinite monkey theorem is completely valid in reality. In reality and physics, I think an error occurs if you substitute infinity.
Isn't the probability of an event a measure of possibility, not certainty? Is the infinite monkey theorem valid in the reality of a universe with infinite time?
Boltzmann's brain, entropy reduction, Poincaré's recursion theorem, the probability of oxygen molecules in a room gathering in one place, the probability of quantum tunneling of macroscopic objects, etc. are theoretically possible. But the probability of these events is very low. Additionally...
Because macroscopic objects visible to the naked eye cannot be separated from their environment due to quantum decoherence, is it impossible to accidentally experience quantum tunneling even in a universe with infinite time? Is this something that will never happen? Absolutely impossible?