From what I've been able to find online, the symbol ##\tilde{D}(S)## is the same as the usual symbol for domain of dependence, but only for timelike curves rather than any causal curve, according to this stack overflow post...
I'm reading Tipler's 1976 paper, "Causality Violation in Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes" and he keeps using a symbol which seems to resemble the symbol for Future Null Infinity in a strange font, but it's usage doesn't make sense with what I would expect if that's what the symbol meant. He...
Surely though if in one frame the endpoint of the worldline is ##(\tau, 0,0,0)##, in the frame transformed according to ##t' = 2t## the worldlike would end at ##(2\tau, 0,0,0)##, meaning someone using the second set of coordinates wouldn't measure proper time along the path?
I think the root of...
Is what you're saying that the proper time quantity won't be equal to the coordinate time quantity in the ##t'## frame, because in the ##t'## frame you're essentially measuring time in half-units, and once you do the unit conversion it will stop being an issue? Surely though you could construct...
I understand that much. My question is more about *coordinate* time, in the sense that I can imagine constructing a coordinate system in which the observer is spacially at rest, and coordinate time = proper time. I can also imagine constructing a coordinate system in which the observer is...
In texts on General Relativity, the proper time ##d\tau^2 = -ds^2## (with an appropriate choice of metric signature) is commonly said that the time measured by a timelike observer traveling along a path is given by the integral of ##d\tau## along this path. Of course it's possible to construct a...
On pages 106-107 of Spacetime & Geometry, Carroll derives the geodesic equation by extremizing the proper time functional. He writes:
What I am unclear on is the step in 3.47. I understand that the four velocity is normalized to -1 for timelike paths, but if the value of f is fixed, how can we...
i have a friend and i am trying to explain to him that until it interacts with something it is evrywhere and no where but has more of a probability in being in place a than place b or c but until it interacts we don't know so there for it is evrywhere. that is the concept as i understand it. he...