Recent content by fengqiu

  1. F

    A How Do Conservation Laws Apply to a 4 Current in General Relativity?

    Consider a 4 current J^\mu and a metric g then conservation laws will require \del_\mu J^\mu = 0 my lecturer gave me a brief problem and I think I'm missing some understanding of it he writes What I'm not understanding is, where he states, if we choose B to be the time slice between etc...
  2. F

    I Proving Orthogonality of Vector w/ Schnutz Special Relativity Tensors

    Ahhh right I see, that makes sense! thanks for the help guys
  3. F

    I Proving Orthogonality of Vector w/ Schnutz Special Relativity Tensors

    I think it should, but I can't get it to work out. The operator is given in the question in the textbook.
  4. F

    I Proving Orthogonality of Vector w/ Schnutz Special Relativity Tensors

    Thanks for that, but I don't understand why you do this?
  5. F

    I Proving Orthogonality of Vector w/ Schnutz Special Relativity Tensors

    Hmmm, how do you mean? do you mean I need to normalise ##U\cdot U## with itself?
  6. F

    I Proving Orthogonality of Vector w/ Schnutz Special Relativity Tensors

    There's a question in Schnutz - A first course in special relativity Consider a Velocity Four Vector U , and the tensor P whose components are given by Pμν = ημν + UμUν . (a) Show that P is a projection operator that projects an arbitrary vector V into one orthogonal to U . That is, show that...
  7. F

    4 momentum is particle physics

    you, Orodruin are the man! thanks for your help it turns out that we get the same equation for energy equivalence and invariant mass that makes ALOT more sense
  8. F

    4 momentum is particle physics

    i'm just crunching through the calculations now, I'll get back to you if i get the right answer, sorry one more question is that how do you know the pions are going at equal velocities?
  9. F

    4 momentum is particle physics

    oh okay... so if they have the same velocity... that makes a bit more sense... OKAY I'm still confused about the energies. could i not just solve the equation by equating the energies? Cheers\ Adam
  10. F

    4 momentum is particle physics

    Okay so i have a question for you guys if I have a positron striking an electron at rest to create 2 pions( + and -) and I want to calculate the minimum kinnetic energy that the electrons can possesses to create these pions... then the created pions will be at rest correct? so this gives me two...
  11. F

    Bosons and Fermions - interactions

    yes, right, So I plug in x1=x2, so.. the limits of the integration don't matter? or.. the limits are from -a to pos a.. RIGHT any place in the well.. as long as they're together Thanks that makes sense
  12. F

    Equations of Motion Homework: Mass m in x Direction

    OHH I see what you mean, so operate on the free particle wave function THEN find derivative? Cheers
  13. F

    Bosons and Fermions - interactions

    Yeah, the modulus across x. so... would I integrate wrt d(x1-x2) with limits 0?
  14. F

    Bosons and Fermions - interactions

    Oh ok, that sounds right, how do I find the probability that the particles are at the same location? Do I just integrate between two arbitary numbers?
  15. F

    Equations of Motion Homework: Mass m in x Direction

    Yes but I'm not given x(t) so how would I find it's time derivative to average? Cheeeers
Back
Top