PhilDSP: I don't understand equation (19) either. In my original post I said I found it convincing up to pg. 4. I don't know why he finds a Galilean invariant form of Maxwell's equations and then goes onto use the Lorentz transformations. He loses me there. Up to pg. 4, however, it was making a...
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0511103.pdf
I was wondering what people thought of this paper. Please read up to at least page 3 before responding.
I find it to be pretty convincing up to page 4.
Thanks for any response.